Aborted foetal cell lines & Vaccines

“Another misconception is that organs are salvaged after the abortion. Although this is in itself a heinous crime, the harvesting of organs for medical research is far more premeditated. The following is an excerpt from a 2015 publication in a medical journal regarding the development of a new foetal cell line (walvax-2):

‘The foetal material was provided by the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of Yunnan Hospital, with legal and ethical agreements from the donator. Before the study, we made strict and comprehensive inclusion criteria in order to guarantee a high-quality cell strain:

1.       gestational age 2 to 4 months;

2.       induction of labor with the water bag method;

3.       the parent’s career should not involve contact with chemicals and radiation;

4.       both parents are in good health without neoplastic and genetic diseases, and with no history of human tissue or organ transplantation in the families traced for 3 generations; and

5.       no infectious diseases. The tissues from the freshly aborted foetuses were immediately sent to the laboratory for the preparation of the cells.

In simple language: several infants of a gestational age of 2-4 months were screened, picked for their gender, race and pristine medical history. The date of the abortion is chosen, labour is induced, organs are extracted while the child is alive (denoted by the word ‘fresh’), then transported. The cause of death is the removal of the organs by vivisection. The method described above in 2015 is virtually unchanged from the method of organ harvesting in 1952.”

The attached work of FLI’s Director of Research displays the reliance of many vaccines and other medical products upon multiple aborted foetal cell lines, over several decades.

In many cases we have found direct evidence that a human foetal cell line was involved, e.g. from the ‘label’ (package insert, etc). This is indicated in the reports.

Sometimes we have relied on other publicly available information.

These reports are not comprehensive. They reflect the current state of our research. If no untainted products are shown for a given purpose, there may still exist some, not yet found or under consideration.

Readers are encouraged to do their own research. We are not promoting any particular products, tainted or untainted but merely providing the information shown to assist people to avoid the tainted ones.